Repository logo
 

Impact of pharmacists as immunizers on vaccination rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorIsenor, JE
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, NT
dc.contributor.authorAlia, TA
dc.contributor.authorSlayter, KL
dc.contributor.authorMacDougall, DM
dc.contributor.authorMcNeil, SA
dc.contributor.authorBowles, SK
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-16T12:01:22Z
dc.date.available2017-10-31T08:50:04Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractBackground: Underutilization of vaccination programs remains a significant public health concern. Pharmacists serve as educators, facilitators, and in some jurisdictions, as administrators of vaccines. Though pharmacists have been involved with immunizations in various ways for many years, there has yet to be a systematic review assessing the impact of pharmacists as immunizers in these three roles. Objective: To complete a systematic review of the literature on the impact of pharmacists as educators, facilitators, and administrators of vaccines on immunization rates. Methods: We identified 2825 articles searching the following databases from inception until October 2015: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Libraries, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Google Scholar. Grey literature was identified through use of the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health “Grey Matters” search tool. Content from relevant journals and references of included studies were also searched. Inclusion criteria were clinical or epidemiologic studies in which pharmacists were involved in the immunization process. Studies were excluded if no comparator was reported. Two reviewers independently completed data extraction and bias assessments using standardized forms. Results: Thirty-six studies were included in the review, 22 assessed the role of pharmacists as educators and/or facilitators and 14 assessed their role as administrators of vaccines. All studies reviewed found an increase in vaccine coverage when pharmacists were involved in the immunization process, regardless of role (educator, facilitator, administrator) or vaccine administered (e.g., influenza, pneumococcal), when compared to vaccine provision by traditional providers without pharmacist involvement. Limitations of the results include the large number of non-randomized trials and the heterogeneity between study designs. Conclusions: Pharmacist involvement in immunization, whether as educators, facilitators, or administrators of vaccines, resulted in increased uptake of immunizations. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42013005067en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDalhousie Pharmacy Endowment Funden_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDrug Evaluation Alliance of Nova Scotia (DEANS)en_US
dc.identifier.citationPublished version: Isenor JE, Edwards NT, Alia TA, Slayter KL, McNeil SA, MacDougall D, Bowles SK. Impact of pharmacists as immunizers on vaccination rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccine. 2016; 34: 5708-23. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.08.085en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/72589
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectImmunizeren_US
dc.subjectPharmacistsen_US
dc.subjectVaccinationen_US
dc.subjectPharmaceutical services
dc.titleImpact of pharmacists as immunizers on vaccination rates: a systematic review and meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeTexten_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Isenor Vaccine 2016 Post-Print Nov 2016(1).pdf
Size:
607.08 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Peer reviewed Manuscript - embargo until 2017-10-31

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections