Measuring Knowledge Translation Uptake Using Citation Metrics: A Case Study of a Pan-Canadian Network of Pharmacoepidemiology Researchers
Date
2016
Authors
Rothfus, Melissa
Sketris, Ingrid S.
Traynor, Robyn
Helwig, Melissa
Stewart, Samuel A.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Collecting citation metric data is important, as research funders
are increasingly demanding impact assessment, but there is
limited consensus on the most rigorous and accurate
approach. We compared three sources of citation counts
(Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus) to determine their
reliability, comprehensiveness, and currency. We identified
each tool’s strengths and limitations, particularly when considering
team outputs. Citation counts varied, with poor overall
agreement: Fleiss’ kappa, 0.075 (95% CI [0.01, 0.12]).
Researchers, funders, and administrators need to understand
each tool’s unique strengths and limitations and develop
guidelines for use within specific contexts.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Melissa Rothfus, Ingrid S. Sketris, Robyn Traynor, Melissa Helwig & Samuel A. Stewart (2016): Measuring Knowledge Translation Uptake Using Citation Metrics: A Case Study of a Pan-Canadian Network of Pharmacoepidemiology Researchers, Science & Technology Libraries, 35(3), 228–240. DOI: 10.1080/0194262X.2016.1192008