Evaluating Strategies for Plan Coordination: A Survey of Canadian Planners
dc.contributor.author | McCarthy, Stephen | |
dc.contributor.author | Grant, Jill | |
dc.contributor.author | Habib, Muhammad Ahsanul | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-16T12:34:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-16T12:34:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.description | pre-print version of the paper | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | In the contemporary context, many Canadian cities have large numbers of plans that present major challenges for coordination and implementation. The paper reports the results of a survey of Canadian planning practitioners who were asked about the strategies they use to coordinate plans and policies. The most highly-rated strategy, collaborating and sharing data for consensus-based decision-making, reflects the dominance of the collaborative planning paradigm in motivating the discipline. Data analysis discovered strong correlations between perceptions of the efficacy of a strategy and practitioners saying they used the strategy: in other words, planners value not only what they have been taught in theory, but what they do in practice. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Stephen McCarthy, Jill L. Grant & Muhammad Ahsanul Habib (2019) Evaluating strategies for plan coordination: a survey of Canadian planners, International Planning Studies, DOI: 10.1080/13563475.2019.1578201 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10222/78026 | |
dc.publisher | Routledge, Taylor and Francis | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Planning Studies | en_US |
dc.title | Evaluating Strategies for Plan Coordination: A Survey of Canadian Planners | en_US |
dc.type | Text | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- McCarthy, Grant, Habib - evaluating strategies (2019).pdf
- Size:
- 735.81 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Pre-print version
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.71 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: