Repository logo
 

Evaluating Strategies for Plan Coordination: A Survey of Canadian Planners

dc.contributor.authorMcCarthy, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorGrant, Jill
dc.contributor.authorHabib, Muhammad Ahsanul
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-16T12:34:42Z
dc.date.available2020-03-16T12:34:42Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.descriptionpre-print version of the paperen_US
dc.description.abstractIn the contemporary context, many Canadian cities have large numbers of plans that present major challenges for coordination and implementation. The paper reports the results of a survey of Canadian planning practitioners who were asked about the strategies they use to coordinate plans and policies. The most highly-rated strategy, collaborating and sharing data for consensus-based decision-making, reflects the dominance of the collaborative planning paradigm in motivating the discipline. Data analysis discovered strong correlations between perceptions of the efficacy of a strategy and practitioners saying they used the strategy: in other words, planners value not only what they have been taught in theory, but what they do in practice.en_US
dc.identifier.citationStephen McCarthy, Jill L. Grant & Muhammad Ahsanul Habib (2019) Evaluating strategies for plan coordination: a survey of Canadian planners, International Planning Studies, DOI: 10.1080/13563475.2019.1578201en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/78026
dc.publisherRoutledge, Taylor and Francisen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Planning Studiesen_US
dc.titleEvaluating Strategies for Plan Coordination: A Survey of Canadian Plannersen_US
dc.typeTexten_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
McCarthy, Grant, Habib - evaluating strategies (2019).pdf
Size:
735.81 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Pre-print version

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections