Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLatouf, Elie
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-17T16:32:44Z
dc.date.available2024-10-17T16:32:44Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-10
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/84646
dc.descriptionThis study assesses the hydraulic and thermal performance of three heat exchangers in solar hot water systems: shell and tube, shell and twisted tube, and brazed plate. Although the brazed plate and shell and twisted tube models are designed for high-power applications, the study investigates their performance at lower power levels (up to 3 kW). A shell and coil heat exchanger from a previous study is also included for comparison. Results show that the brazed plate heat exchanger performs better than the shell and tube and twisted tube models but is less efficient than the shell and coil heat exchanger used by Thermo Dynamics Ltd.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluates the hydraulic and thermal performance of three heat exchangers used in hot water solar systems: shell and tube, shell and twisted tube, and brazed plate. The shell and tube heat exchanger is provided by Thermo Dynamics Ltd., while the brazed plate (type M14A) and shell and twisted tube (type PL45) models are supplied by SEC Ltd. SEC Ltd.'s data for the Brazed Plate and Shell and Twisted Tube heat exchangers are intended for high-power applications of 12 kW and above, however, this study investigates their performance at lower power levels, up to 3 kW. In addition to these three heat exchangers, the study also includes a comparative analysis with a shell and coil heat exchanger, as studied by (Gharbia, 2010). In the experimental setup, a 40% propylene glycol solution is circulated through one side of each heat exchanger, with water flowing through the other due to buoyancy-induced flow. The heat exchangers vary in surface area: Shell and Tube (0.36 m²), Shell and Twisted Tube (0.15 m²), Brazed Plate (0.14 m²). The study indicates that the brazed plate heat exchanger has superior thermal performance compared to both the shell and twisted tube as well as shell and tube configurations. However, it exhibits lower performance in comparison to the shell and 4-coils heat exchanger, which is currently used by Thermo Dynamics Ltd. for hot water solar systems.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectHeat exchangersen_US
dc.subjectSolar panelsen_US
dc.subjectBrazed plateen_US
dc.subjectShell and twisted tubeen_US
dc.subjectShell and tubeen_US
dc.subjectBuoyancy induced flowen_US
dc.subjectNatural Convectionen_US
dc.titleInvestigation of Heat Exchangers for a Solar Domestic Hot Water Systemen_US
dc.date.defence2024-10-07
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.degreeMaster of Applied Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinerMichael Cadaen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerIsmet Ugursalen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorPeter Allenen_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicableen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record